14th July 2026
Agenda
Action items from the last call - Bosko
Van Rossem Upgrade Update - Bosko, all
Ratified on 13th July, will be enacted on 18th July
Reimburse Ikigai TWA expired without reaching 67% threshold
~93-96% blocks with protocol v11 produced, exchanges at 84.19% readiness
Comms - Ian / Larisa
Technical support before and after hard fork enactment - Bosko, Can
Dijkstra era hard fork - Bosko, all
Scope
Shortlist doc (the only other one that is not mentioned here and is mentioned elsewhere is CIP-151)
Must haves for v12
Could haves for v12, potentially intra era v13
Delayed to full era v14
Timeline windows (depending on the scope)
Q4 2026
Q1 2027
Q2 2027
CIP 179 - Tesera application - Matthieu P, Thomas L, Ryan C
AOB
Key materials
Summary
van Rossem hard fork
Ratified on 13th July (643), will be enacted on 18th July (644)
Initially defined bridge call seems to be not working so another one should be scheduled
Dijkstra Era hard fork
Scope
Different scope sources collected so far are all similar
All of them have big key features listed
Most of the difference stems from the wishlist scope candidates
Timing
There are different high level time windows where Dijkstra full era hard fork can land and it will be heavily affected with scope
Q4 2026, Q1 2027, Q2 2027
Prioritization & process
There is no process defined, aligned and agreed
Drafting it should be happening in parallel with freezing the scope of the first next hard fork, full era Dijkstra one
Aiming to have hard fork happening by the end of 2026 implies very conservative approach to the scope freeze, so only absolute necessities should go in
Other items could go to the next intra-era hard fork or the future full era (which should respect the process that is yet to be defined)
Adding all items from the CIP shortlist would likely result in a delay and having the hard fork in Q2 2027 at best, likely later
Haskell node team is invited to give a walkthrough of the scope they are working against to help make decisions on freezing the scope as soon as possible, by the end of the month
CIP-23 was mentioned as Dijkstra scope candidate as a long waited implementation and Haskell team will come back with whats meaningfully possible to make progress against the current timeline
Hard Fork Working Group meetings will continue to happen twice a week, until at least the Dijkstra hard fork scope is set, after which the future meeting cadence will be decided
Hard Fork Working Group communication channels
Discord —
#wg-hard-fork
Action items and next steps
van Rossem hard fork
Bosko: Create the new bridge link call (one public and one internal) to be available during and after van Rossem hard fork enactment time window
Dijkstra Era hard fork
Geoff/Carlos/Alexey: Give a walkthrough of the scope being worked against by the Haskell node team(s) on the next hard fork working group meeting on 17th July
Kevin/Sam L/Ryan C W: Draft the decision making and prioritization process for future hard forks
Bosko: Continue creating supporting structure and relevant documentation within the hard fork working group GitBook space under Technical Steering Committee
Tex: Create ecosystem dependency mapping document(s)
Last updated